D. D. Jonge
To Win
J. Graca
To Win
Patrick Kaukovalta vs Daniel De Jonge Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L L W L L W L
Form
W W L W W W L W W LHead-To-Head: Kaukovalta 1 - 0 Jonge
They have played 2 sets in total, with Kaukovalta winning 2 and Jonge winning 0. The last match between Kaukovalta and Jonge was at the M15 Kalmar, 16-05-2024, Second, Clay with Patrick Kaukovalta getting the victory 6-0 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Patrick Kaukovalta | 1 |
| Daniel De Jonge | 0 |
M15 Kalmar(16-05-2024)
6
0
6
4
| Kaukovalta | Stats | Jonge |
|---|---|---|
| 29% (2-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 74% (20-7) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 831 | Ranking | N/A |
| 767 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 26 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 44% (55-69) | Career Total W/L | 57% (120-92) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
- / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Agut VS Clar PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Stearns VS Birrell PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kaukovalta VS Jonge H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-4 |
Stats 
Patrick Kaukovalta
Player
Daniel De Jonge
37%
(
24 of
65)
1st Serve %
31%
(
16 of
52)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
12 of
16)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
Kaukovalta VS Jonge H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:36:0 | Average Match Time | 1:36:0 |
| 37% (24/65) | 1st Serve % | 31% (16/52) |
| 96% (23/24) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (12/16) |
| 41% (17/41) | 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (11/36) |
| 38% (5/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 10% (1/10) |
| 56% (29/52) | Return Points Win % | 38% (25/65) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Patrick Kaukovalta Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-2 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
James Story
Player
Patrick Kaukovalta
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Henrik Bladelius
Player
Patrick Kaukovalta
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
9
Aces
7
8
Double Faults
8
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
5-7 6-1 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-7(9) 6-2 10-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Patrick Kaukovalta
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Kaukovalta
Player
Oskari Paldanius
58%
(
63 of
108)
1st Serve %
60%
(
60 of
100)
14
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
7
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
44%
(
20 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
41 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
100)
104
Total Points Won
104
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Patrick Kaukovalta
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
6
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel De Jonge Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Axel Garcian
Player
Daniel De Jonge
47%
(
41 of
87)
1st Serve %
55%
(
55 of
100)
10
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
6
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
100)
98
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Tristan Berard
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
96%
(
24 of
25)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Yoshka Sborowsky
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Loann Massard
Player
Daniel De Jonge
60%
(
75 of
126)
1st Serve %
60%
(
75 of
126)
15
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
52 of
75)
55%
(
28 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
46 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
49 of
126)
129
Total Points Won
123
|
7-6(5) 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve %
50%
(
15 of
30)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
93%
(
14 of
15)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
13 of
15)
20%
(
1 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
25
Total Points Won
25
|
4-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Ismael Soussi
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Evan Jarzaguet
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
3
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joshua Lapadat
Player
Daniel De Jonge
68%
(
73 of
107)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
37%
(
40 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Daniel Milavsky
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
5
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Ronald Hohmann
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 44% (55/69) | Win/Loss | 57% (120/92) |
| 45% (126/152) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (255/211) |
| 48% (1217/1311) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2293/2118) |
| 60% (21/14) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (29/24) |
| 36% (21/38) | Clay Win/Loss | 53% (54/47) |
| 43% (13/17) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (37/21) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.25 |
| 377 | Aces Total | 529 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.36 |
| 339 | Total Double Faults | 778 |
| 1:9:38 | Average Match Time | 1:6:43 |
| 398.17 | Average Opponent Rank | 344.31 |
| 56% (3418/6084) | 1st Serve % | 55% (5029/9204) |
| 67% (2299/3418) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (3498/5029) |
| 45% (1195/2666) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (1884/4175) |
| 44% (245/556) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (419/980) |
| 38% (2213/5789) | Return Points Win % | 41% (3861/9396) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25% (3/9) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (52/59) | Futures W/L | 57% (120/92) |
| 44% (54/123) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (116/208) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (11/21) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (21/41) |
| 44% (14/32) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (26/47) |
| 78% (59/46) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (116/105) |
| 22% (59/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (116/11) |
| 13% (64/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (95/13) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
